// OWNERSHIP
Ownership
Who owns the consequences once implementation stops being the hard part.
Building software has become cheap, and the arguments about it are mostly about speed. The part that stayed expensive is the one nobody photographs: somebody has to hold the context, carry the maintenance and answer for the system a year later. These pieces circle that question from three directions, from a classroom, from a team of six, and from the current enthusiasm for building without developers.
article
What happens to innovation when implementation becomes almost free? →
When code, design and content all get cheap, the bottleneck moves. A note from the classroom about where excellence still shows up.
article
Why six people are enough and what coding agents have to do with it →
Six developers run Sulu and its projects. Ownership and context are what make that work, and agents need the same things.
article
Vibe coding is no-code without a custodian →
Another attempt at software without developers. The difference to no-code is not the abstraction level, it is that nobody is left to look after it.